Daniel De Jonge vs Marc Schmidt Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jonge vs Schmidt analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel De Jonge vs Marc Schmidt Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jonge 0 - 0 Schmidt
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jonge has won 41.47% of points on their second serve, while Schmidt has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jonge, in recent form, has won 54.89% of their opponent's second serve points, while Schmidt has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.6% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jonge has saved 57.66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Schmidt has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jonge has won 56% of matches played (W/L 28/ 22), with Schmidt winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jonge has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 6/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 29/ 24). Schmidt has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Jonge has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56% of matches (W/L 28/ 22), where as Schmidt has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jonge has played against opponents with an average rank of 113.48 while Schmidt has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jonge has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Schmidt has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jonge has converted 45.16% of breakpoint opportunities, and Schmidt has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
Form
56% (96-74)
Career Total W/L
0% (0-11)
50% (10-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
![banner](https://matchstat.com/assets/images/matchstat-banner.webp)
The Best Odds For Daniel De Jonge vs Marc Schmidt For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Jonge VS Schmidt
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
w/o |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Daniel De Jonge | Marc Schmidt |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (10/10) | 0% (0/1) |
Sets Win/Loss | 48% (21/23) | 0% (0/2) |
Games Win/Loss | 49% (190/201) | 0% (0/12) |
Hard Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.19 | 0 |
Aces Total | 37 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.54 | 0 |
DFs Total | 103 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:21:6 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 33.9 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 51% (515/1019) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 68% (348/515) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 41% (209/504) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 45% (42/93) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 40% (402/997) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 50% (10/10) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (10/20) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Daniel De Jonge Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Daniel De Jonge
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
5
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
3
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
33%
(
13 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Luke Simkiss
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
6
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Luca Staeheli
Player
Daniel De Jonge
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve %
59%
(
16 of
27)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
9 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
36
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Sebastian Sorger
Player
Daniel De Jonge
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Filip Pieczonka
46%
(
31 of
67)
1st Serve %
42%
(
21 of
50)
0
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
2
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Jakub Jedrzejczak
52%
(
47 of
91)
1st Serve %
74%
(
73 of
99)
1
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
1
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
47%
(
43 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
50 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 4-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Patrick Kaukovalta
Player
Daniel De Jonge
37%
(
24 of
65)
1st Serve %
31%
(
16 of
52)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
12 of
16)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Unknown Player
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
7
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
9 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
45
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H |
view more
Marc Schmidt Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Yannik Steinegger
Player
Marc Schmidt
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve %
76%
(
22 of
29)
11
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
49
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Martijn Fens
Player
Marc Schmidt
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
9
88%
(
14 of
16)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | w/o | H2H |
view more
Jonge Vs Schmidt Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Jonge are available here and Schmidt photos here.
![Jonge Schmidt H2h Summary Stats 3rd July 2024 Jonge Schmidt H2h Summary Stats 3rd July 2024](https://matchstat.com/captures/ms/atp/Daniel-De-Jonge-Marc-Schmidt-h2h-profile.webp)
![Daniel De Jonge Marc Schmidt Prediction Stats Daniel De Jonge Marc Schmidt Prediction Stats](https://matchstat.com/captures/ms/atp/Daniel-De-Jonge-Marc-Schmidt-h2h-stats.webp)